Peaking at the right time – An integrated programme for athletes

By Iñigo Mujika on August 31st 2010

International Sports Science and Sports Medicine ConferenceThe second International Sports Science and Sports Medicine Conference took place between August 19 and 21 in Newcastle, United Kingdom. One year before, the organising committee set the following aim for the first conference: to deliver the premier International Sports Science and Sports Medicine Conference, bringing together national and international experts in sports medicine and exercise science, embracing both public health and the world of elite sport, to review a range of issues in the build-up to the 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games and beyond. Feedback from delegates at the first conference was very positive, and this encouraged the organisers to repeat the event in 2010. Matching the quality of last year’s programme was a challenge, but they succeeded in attracting an outstanding cast of delegates to the event.

The session I presented at was entitled “Peaking at the right time”, and I was honoured to share the session with my dear friend Professor Louise Burke, Head of Sports Nutrition at the Australian Institute of Sport, who did an outstanding job at summarising recent innovations in sports nutrition research that should be incorporated into individualised competition nutrition practices. The session also included a remarkable presentation by UK Athletics Combined Events Coach Antonio Minichiello, who has coached World Medallists in both winter (Bobsleigh) and summer (Heptathlon) sports.

An abstract of my own presentation, entitled “Peaking at the right time – An integrated programme for athletes” can be read below:

The training programs of high-level athletes usually include a training phase characterized by a reduction of the training load during the final days leading to a major competition, known as a taper. The aim of the taper is to diminish residual fatigue induced by intensive training, maximize physiological adaptations and consequently performance (Bosquet et al. 2007). A recent meta-analysis provides a framework that can be useful for athletes, coaches and sport scientists to optimize their tapering strategy, suggesting that performance is maximized by a taper lasting two weeks, where the training volume is exponentially decreased by 41-60%, without any modification of either training intensity or frequency (Bosquet et al. 2007).

Mathematical models of the effects of training on performance have significantly contributed to the understanding and optimization of pre-competition recovery programs. Simulations based on linear model parameters have contributed to establish the optimal taper duration and the suitability of progressive versus step tapers (Mujika et al. 1996; Banister et al. 1999). Variable dose-response model parameters have been recently used to assess optimal taper characteristics of elite swimmers, predicting that increasing the training load by 20% for four weeks prior to the taper to overreach the athletes could contribute to optimize performance, but would require a longer taper to completely dissipate fatigue and elicit further adaptations (Thomas et al. 2008). Computer simulations also predict that a 20-30% increase in the training load during the final three days of the taper would not compromise fatigue removal and could be beneficial to performance by eliciting additional adaptations (Thomas et al. 2009).

Tapering-induced performance gains, which have variously been attributed to increased levels of muscular force and power, improvements in neuromuscular, hematological, and hormonal function, and psychological status of the athletes, are usually in the range of 0.5-6.0% for competition performance measures (Mujika & Padilla 2003). Performance improvements associated with the taper seem to be independent of sex, event duration and relative metabolic contribution to the total energy provision, technical and biomechanical aspects of competition, and the calibre of the athlete. These performance gains may have a major impact on competition placing (Mujika et al. 2002)

Environmental factors like travel across time zones, heat and altitude may interfere with an athlete’s preparation for international level competition, but the interactions between the taper and these environmental stressors have not been studied. Nevertheless, reducing the training load has been recommended as a means to cope with jet-lag, and this training reduction should be integrated in an athlete’s taper program. As well, the physiological benefits derived from the adaptations to the new environment presumably transfer during the taper to enhance competitive performance. Tapering in hot conditions prior to competition seems to be compatible with the reduction in training volume advocated when encountering heat stress. Similarly, training camps at altitude usually require an initial reduction in training load, which in itself may constitute a form of tapering (Pyne et al. 2009).

References

  • BANISTER, E. W., J. B. CARTER, and P. C. ZARKADAS. Training theory and taper: validation in triathlon athletes. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 79: 182-191, 1999.
  • BOSQUET, L., J. MONTPETIT, D. ARVISAIS, I. MUJIKA. Effects of tapering on performance: a meta-analysis. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 39: 1358-1365, 2007.
  • MUJIKA, I., T. BUSSO, L. LACOSTE, F. BARALE, A. GEYSSANT, J.C. CHATARD. Modeled responses to training and taper in competitive swimmers. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 28 (2): 251-258, 1996.
  • MUJIKA, I., S. PADILLA. Scientific bases for pre-competition tapering strategies. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 35: 1182-1187, 2003.
  • MUJIKA, I., S. PADILLA, D. PYNE. Swimming performance changes during the final 3 weeks of training leading to the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games. International Journal of Sports Medicine 23: 582-587, 2002.
  • PYNE, D.B, I. MUJIKA, T. REILLY. Peaking for optimal performance: research limitations and future directions. Journal of Sports Sciences 27 (3): 195-202, 2009.
  • THOMAS, L., I. MUJIKA, T. BUSSO. A model study of optimal training reduction during pre-event taper in elite swimmers. Journal of Sports Sciences 26: 643-652, 2008.
  • THOMAS, L., I. MUJIKA, T. BUSSO. Computer simulations assessing the potential performance benefit of a final increase in training during pre-event taper. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 23 (6): 1729-1736.
Share this post

 

Related posts

Reply

A vibratory bar for upper body: feasibility and acute effects on EMGrms activity

By Iñigo Mujika on August 25th 2010

Moras G, Rodríguez-Jiménez S, Tous-Fajardo J, Ranz D, Mujika I.

J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Aug;24(8):2132-42.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of a purpose-designed vibratory bar (VB) as a potential vibration training device and thereafter to assess its effects on upper-body muscles’ electromyographic (EMG) activity during vibration.

During session 1, 16 physically active males held the VB during the bench press exercise in an isometric extended position (EP) in the following vibration conditions selected in the inverter (i): no vibration (0), 20, 30, 40, and 50 Hzi. Maximal acceleration (Accmax), frequency (Freq), and peak-to-peak amplitude (Ampp-p) obtained at the center (C) and at the end (E) of the VB were assessed using an accelerometer.

During session 2, EMGrms of the triceps, deltoid, and pectoralis major were recorded in EP and isometric flexion position (FP) at 0, 25, and 45 Hzi. The Accmax, Freq, and Ampp-p values ranged from 37.4 to 96.4 mxs, 18.5 to 30.8 Hz, and 4.6 to 6.1 mm, respectively.

The accelerometer’s position had a significant effect on the Accmax and Ampp-p. All Freq obtained at C and E were different (p < 0.001) to the Freqi. An increase (p < 0.05) in EMGrms was observed in both vibration conditions compared with 0 Hzi, except during 25Hzi for deltoid and pectoralis muscle in FP.

Although no significant differences were found in any of the muscles between 45 Hzi and 25Hzi, the highest EMGrms was elicited at 45Hzi. Although the registered VBs’ parameters seem appropriate for vibration training, the frequency in the FP should be higher than 25 Hzi to induce significant increases in EMGrms in deltoid and pectoralis muscles.

The use of a vibratory bar may be a suitable system to simultaneously stimulate upper-body muscles.

Share this post

 

Related posts

2 comments

  1. Where can one find such a system? I own a whole body unit but have been unable to find one for bars etc.

    Thank You
    Yosef Johnson

    November 30, 2010
  2. The bar was especially designed and custom made for the study. You can contact the corresponding author Dr. Gerard Moras, gmoras@gencat.net for details.

    November 30, 2010

Reply

Interviews with the elite – Craig Mottram: “It´s important to believe you can beat the African runners”

By Iñigo Mujika on August 11th 2010
Craig Mottram

Craig Mottram.

Why is a man like you training in a place like Vitoria-Gasteiz?

There is a group of Australian athletes based in Vitoria-Gasteiz. The running is great and the weather is very suitable for running. It is also quite easy to access the rest of Europe for racing. I believe where you are happy and have good company are the most important things to make a good training base, and I have those in Vitoria-Gasteiz.

You have been “missing in combat” for a long while; what’s the story?

I stopped after the Beijing Olympics due to Achilles problems. They took a long time to settle down and with all Achilles problems you have to be very careful in your return to full training. I was not in a rush and made sure that they were perfect before returning to full training. I am now in full training and have no problems.

Your competition times are impressive; did you reach your upper limits or do you
think that you still have room for improvement?

I believe I still have better results to come.

Could you describe your training as a teen? When did you start training “seriously” (you can define
that as you wish) and what were your training volumes (weekly kilometers and peak weeks) up to the age of 20?

When I was a teenager I went to a boarding school in Australia so mainly participated in only school sport. I did do triathlons as a teenager and was always active. In terms of weekly kilometers I had no structured training until I was 18-19 years old. At this point I was probably running around 70 km per week. I was able to get up to around 120 km per week pretty quickly as I was always running, swimming, cycling, etc as I was growing up, so I was used to the workload. I started training seriously when I was 19 years old.

Some say that you tend to train like the African runners (Kenians, Ethiopians); do you think it is necessary to train like them to beat them?

I believe it is important to believe you can beat them. If training like them helps you believe its posible, then yes, train like them. But is it necessary to train like the Africans? No, I don’t think so. They are fantastic athletes and have an incredible aerobic base which a lot of European athletes don’t have. It takes years to build such an aerobic base. I have a similar aerobic base due to my upbringing, and this enables me to train at high volumes and at good intensity, this works for me. A lot of athletes can’t handle that level of workload, but get great results of lesser loads etc. I think it’s important to find what works for the individual and take small steps. Be consistent and persistent and the results will come.

Could you make a comparison between Craig Mottram and Kenenisa Bekele?

Not really. We are very different. Kenenisa is one of the greatest distance athletes the world has ever produced. His depth of ability over all distances is second to none.

You have run good times in the 1,500 m and excellent times in the 5,000 m, but your 10,000 m time is not as good. ¿What is your distance?

My distance is 3,000 m. I have not tried to run fast over 10,000 m yet. That will come in time.

You are quite a tall athlete; you pull on your calfs when you run; you are an excellent asphalt runner, but do you have enough patience and technique to run a marathon?

I would think I have enough patience. Technique is another question all together. It is hard to know whether I will be any good at the marathon until I give it a go. I would love to run a good marathon in the future.

Steve Moneghetti is the reference marathon runner in Australia; do you see yourself improving on his achievements in the marathon?

I will try.

From which side of the binoculars do you look at London 2012, i.e. do you see the Games very far or very near? Do you see yourself in the race for the medals?

I believe London is still a long way away. A lot can happen in two years. You have to keep the Games in mind, but it can’t control you. After all it is just another running race. Would you prepare for a hard 13-minute effort two years away?

How serious have you gotten with triathlon training, and at the moment which event are you hoping to do in London 2012?

I am aiming to run the 5,000 m at the London Olympics. I use swimming as cross training.

Share this post

 

Related posts

Reply